Understand western roman law. Frank O'Collins

Chemtrails Geoengineering: The answer

 
"A lot of people have been wondering why jets are releasing chemicals into the atmosphere, visible as `chem trails` and this has stoked a lot of conspiracy theories but a plausible answer has been lacking."  Mathba


Is man messing up life on this planet? Yes. Is the world in a mess? Yes. Is it getting worse? Yes. So what is the role of "chem trails" in all of this?

People are not asking the right questions. This article will help to steer questions in the right direction so that the answer can be found.

More than 2,200 nuclear explosions this past century have taken place, mostly in the northern hemisphere. USA, Britain, France, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, are some of those who have released huge amounts of nuclear radiation in test and accidents. This alone has poisoned much of the air, land and water.

The world's worst ever man made disaster has been continuously unfolding since early 2011: Fukushima. This was far worse than most nuclear disasters in part because of the MOX used to fuel the plant. The damage to the ocean is incalculable and will last thousands, even millions of years, as will the damage to the atmosphere.

One of the largest cover-ups by governments and their lazy, sleepy misguided institutions, as well as the public and private sector looking the other way, is that the effects of Fukishima upon the entire Northern Hemisphere of the world, and especially across North America, is a massive increase in nuclear radiation blown across from Japan and toxic particles falling from the sky especially via rain fall.

If you think that the government and nuclear industry which know about this, are going to do nothing, then you don't live in reality. Yes, it is actually good business for some monopolists that natural life is wiped out on earth so that their genetically engineered products can be sold, or the immense reservoir of clean water from under the Libyan desert, the major reason for the NATO war on Libya: life requires clean water.

But instead of barking up the wrong tree and falling into wild unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that governments are spraying chemtrails as a geo-engineering project in order to control, wipe out, or make people sick. The right answer appears to be that they are actually trying to CLEAN UP the mess they have created: chemtrails are a desperate attempt to ABSORB the above-mentioned particles.

Why don't they share this information with the public? Because, under the pretext that it is not good to cause panic, they also do not wish to draw attention to the consequences of their actions: firstly in having destroyed the planet and secondly in that their only available solutions are also harmful but the lesser of evils. They also don't want the red tape, oversight, controversy, discussion, or anything holding this back.

200 species a day going extinct, mostly due to the soil microbes life being killed, fungus being a slow insidious problem as a result, are realistic observations by those looking at geo-engineering. But those seeking to explain chem-trails are not at all facing the real answer to the real questions of attempting to save lives from cancer and the results of nuclear fallout.

The cat is long out of the bag when it comes to the damage done and the desperate measures and also lack of action being taken but the public has yet to catch on to the big picture. Instead they should be demanding answers to the right questions: why were public nuclear radiation sensors turned off in North America after Fukushima (to avoid embarrassment, panic, questions), is one such question.

Another is that we all know the "system" is bought, sold and paid for, and that the public, especially those jumping up and down with unsubstantiated theories, are going to be ignored. How long did it take for basic 9/11 truths to become properly investigated and consensus arrived at? Each group pulls in their own direction with different theories and all are easy to dismiss individually as lacking in quality.

The elephant in the room is actually the immense out of control spread of cancers in the world now, and the large contribution to this health disaster facing man kind, being the nuclear weapons and nuclear energy industry. Getting people to line up to take vaccinations of toxic poisons and be radiated (chemo "therapy") is not something most people will agree too, and making it compulsory will create an uproar.

Instead it is far easier to just drop these things from above, or at least, to attempt to neutralize some of the damage in the atmosphere. And they're using the usual "western" white man's science to do so, as usual, they create the problem, then they create the solution, and benefit from both at the expense of all others, and without our right to any say in the matter, let alone putting forward alternative holistic solution options.

For those that did not know, this is exactly what happens in many municipalities where toxic waste is deliberately dumped into water supplies in legally allowed quantities. The pretense is that it helps to create "fluoride" in the water as a means of strengthening teeth. The reality is it is a legal and cost-effective way to dispose of waste, exploit loopholes in legislation, unhampered by the public lack of awareness.

Until humanity at the grass roots level, the academics who have largely sold their souls to capital, the thinkers, the independent and investigative journalists, the concerned citizens and activists, learn to unlearn the competition, lack of trust, do-it-alone, go-it-alone, helpless traps and methodology they've grown up in, nothing will change.

Instead we all have to learn to work together on common problems and provide collective sound solutions after logical and scientific process analysis. Each starting their own Facebook chemtrail or their own geo-engineering page, group or website, will get us no where. Take a cue from the 9/11 Best Evidence Panel or "9/11 Consensus Panel", a good place to start in method, regarding the chemtrails issue.

Founder and Editor,
Mathaba News Network

Fukushima killing the entire planet within a generation

The Scale Of Australian Censorship Revealed by Schapelle Corby Case

From: Mathaba

An astonishing cache of internal government correspondence remains hidden from the Australian public

Censorship is a strong word. Sometimes, allegations of censorship can be a matter of perception, or can be exaggerated by those aggrieved. Seldom is cast iron evidence of sustained censorship, by the media of a nation, available. However, in the case of the Schapelle Corby affair, in Australia, it is as conclusive as it is shocking.
Schapelle Corby was sentenced to 20 years in an Indonesian prison in 2005, when 4.2 kg of marijuana was found in her bag upon collection at Denpasar airport.
Whilst the trial effectively disintegrated into a showcase for the judicial abuse of human rights, with Schapelle Corby's pleas for the evidence to be tested and seized being refused, serious questions emerged regarding the conduct of her own government.
Ultimately, a whole raft of material surfaced, which proved, not only that she was entirely innocent, but that Australian ministers, and the Australian Federal Police (AFP), had wilfully withheld the vital primary evidence, had deprived her of the funds for an additional appeal, had managed public opinion to close the political aspects, and had embarked on a lengthy series of abusive and illegal acts against her.
As reported last week by Mathaba News, an entire cache of government documents has been published on the Internet, which conclusively confirms the validity of these statements. It is an astonishing collection of official data, which self-pens utter contempt for a human life, and the flagrant disregard of the integrity of state.
Incredibly, the existence of this raw material has never been reported in Australia.
THE PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
Politically and socially, the lack of an adequately functional media presents a serious problem for Australia, in terms of the health of its democracy.
However, what does it mean in practical terms, in the context of the case itself, and Schapelle Corby's harrowing situation? The following is a list of just some of the material facts, the discovery of which have been censored, and hidden from the public:

1. Schapelle Corby's boogie-board bag was the only one not scanned at Sydney Airport: it was diverted past the scanner by baggage staff, who were known to have been engaging in other corrupt activity. Customs Minister Ellison withheld this life critical information, even when Schapelle Corby’s lawyer asked directly about scanning. [Transit Report]
2. This information was also hidden from Parliament, when direct questions were asked, and critically, it was withheld from the Bali court. John Howard, and his long term colleague, Head of Sydney Airport Corporation Ltd, Max Moore-Wilton, were also aware, but remained silent. [Transit Report]
3. The AFP never investigated the reason for this missing screening data, and AFP Commissioner Keelty, who was also informed, never commented upon it. Keelty was also aware, via Operation Mocha, that the same baggage handlers were simultaneously engaging in other drug related activities. [Transit Report]
4. Schapelle Corby checked her bags in underweight, but they were subsequently found to be 5kg overweight on the Qantas system (which would have carried an excess charge of $175). This clearly indicated the addition of a significant weight factor, after the bags left her hands. [Transit Report]
5. Again, neither Schapelle Corby, nor the Bali court, were ever provided with this critical information. [Supplementary Report]
6. Two weeks before the verdict, AFP Commissioner Keelty told the media that there was no evidence of airport drug syndicates using innocent passengers, when this was clearly, demonstrably, and utterly, false. The AFP had held the Kessing Reports for months, and it withheld a host of other vital support evidence, which proved the long term and systemic nature of such syndication at Sydney Airport. [Transit Report]
7. The AFP and DFAT demonstrably evaded and frustrated the forensic and DNA tests which Schapelle Corby begged for in court. [Mutual Evasion Report]
8. The AFP told Parliament that it couldn't perform marijuana pollen tests, when it had the capacity to do so, and indeed, had originally offered to perform them for the INP. It also refused the services of a forensics expert, who had volunteered to perform them. [Mutual Evasion Report]
9. Ellison subsequently told a clearly false story about marijuana testing, in a written letter to a constituent. [Mutual Evasion Report]
10. DFAT did not invoke the MACMA treaty to obtain the sample of marijuana (for DNA testing) which Schapelle Corby begged for, when it could have done so within the provisions of the treaty itself. [Mutual Evasion Report]
11. The AFP and Qantas provided wholly contradictory stories about the missing CCTV footage, which Schapelle Corby pleaded for. No footage was ever provided, from any airport, despite over 800 cameras being in situ. [Transit Report]
12. Foreign Minister Downer, and Prime Minister Howard, publicly endorsed the original Bali trial, when they were well aware that a multitude of legal and human rights abuses had been committed throughout. [Bali Trial Report]
13. Ellison publicly endorsed the burning of the physical evidence, whilst Schapelle Corby pleaded desperately for it to be preserved and tested. [Mutual Evasion Report]
14. DFAT have, de facto, endorsed and suppressed the ongoing and documented abuses of a mentally ill Australian citizen for more than nine years. [Health Report]
15. ACLEI, when forced to examine the AFP's role in the affair, was directly and demonstrably complicit with an AFP officer, in producing a report which was an utter embarrassment to all parties. A functionary, who was at the heart of the Howard regime when the AFP abuses occurred, was allowed to rubber stamp ACLEI's complicit rubber stamp. [Whitewash Report]
16. The government pressed and forced an Australian QC, Mark Trowell, on to Schapelle Corby for her appeal. He then decimated the appeal by attacking her defence team to the media. When he subsequently admitted that he was working for the government, and not for Schapelle Corby, the government refused to comment. The precise role of Justice & Customs Minister Ellison in this affair, Trowell’s long term friend, has never been explained. [Insider Report]
17. Downer and Howard publicly described a standard flour hoax at the Indonesian embassy as a “murderous attack”, using a “biological agent”, when there was no evidence whatsoever to suggest that it wasn’t benign. Neither of them revealed that the note included with the flour didn't refer to Schapelle Corby at all, and was written in Bahasa, when they promptly blamed it on her supporters [PowderGate Report]
18. Ellison did not alert any of the parties necessary to prevent the false, but support-wrecking, story from circulating around the world. Yet, he was informed of the benign nature of the flour, by email, at 6:35pm on the same day [PowderGate Report]
19. The government seized Schapelle Corby's book royalties under proceeds of crime legislation, whilst she was still in legal process in Indonesia, sending a clear signal to Jakarta. It further brought the judiciary into disrepute, by illegally extending its jurisdiction outside Australian borders, and holding secret trials, at which Schapelle Corby was not even represented [Political Seizure Report]
20. The government thus denied her the funds for a further appeal, and for medication, despite full knowledge of the nature of the original trial, and of the vital primary evidence which had been wilfully withheld [Political Seizure Report]
21. Dozens of breaches of the Freedom of Information Act, with respect to requests made on behalf of Schapelle Corby, have been recorded. The AFP alone has spent in the region of $1 million in frustrating efforts to obtain further evidential information. [FOI Abuse Report]
22. The AFP suppressed a secret recording of two known criminals discussing the collection of marijuana from Sydney Airport on the same day that Schapelle Corby flew to Bali [Candidate Sources Report]
23. The Commonwealth Ombudsman has supported the government with respect to every complaint ever lodged relating to Schapelle Corby by members of the public. The same applies to the ACMA, the OAIC, and every other quango presented to the public as a ‘watchdog’. [Quango Report]
24. Serious media abuses, including direct criminal matters, such as phone hacking and illegal recording, were submitted to the Finkelstein media inquiry in 2011, but were excluded. Compelling evidence of political interference with respect to the ABC, and of subsequent editorial and reporting abuses, continues to be ignored. [Media Reports]
25. The Attorney-General refused to accept a formal Crime Report, including a 450 page evidential Addendum, which documented serious breaches of the law by politicians and the AFP [Crime Report].

It is also noteworthy that current events and developments continue to be censored. These include a formal submission to the UN in New York and Geneva, from citizens across 51 nations (submission PDF), and a series of street protests in support of this submission, most notably by the leader of the 2007 Saffron revolution, U Gambira.
ACHIEVING CLOSURE
There is no room for any doubt at all. This is a scandal of enormous proportion, embracing criminal acts by former government ministers and the AFP, and the consequential abuses of the human rights of an innocent citizen. Yet, it is unreported by that nation's media. Instead, the worst form of journalism has thrived, as smears and fabrications have abounded, and public sympathy for the victim has been sedated.
Previous misreporting, has in itself, created self-interest in perpetuating this situation indefinitely, as have direct media abuses of Schapelle Corby in Kerobokan prison itself, whilst she suffered a deteriorating mental illness. Australia's closed media, with its limited plurality of ownership, has become a breeding ground for the sort of journalism which must make foreign scribes shudder.
When the truth is finally exposed to the Australian public, real closure of the Schapelle Corby affair cannot be achieved until those who are culpable for such shocking media activities are also called to account.
Further information on the role of the Australian media is available on the following page: http://www.expendable.tv/p/media.html

NSA Google & Yahoo. How did they do it?

It's quite simple really, and as the WaPo explains, the NSA "has secretly broken into the main communications links that connect Yahoo and Google data centers around the world, according to documents obtained from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden and interviews with knowledgeable officials. By tapping those links, the agency has positioned itself to collect at will from among hundreds of millions of user accounts, many of them belonging to Americans. The NSA does not keep everything it collects, but it keeps a lot."
In a nutshell - 181,280,466 new records in 1 month:

According to a top secret accounting dated Jan. 9, 2013, NSA’s acquisitions directorate sends millions of records every day from Yahoo and Google internal networks to data warehouses at the agency’s Fort Meade headquarters. In the preceding 30 days, the report said, field collectors had processed and sent back 181,280,466 new records — ranging from “metadata,” which would indicate who sent or received e-mails and when, to content such as text, audio and video.

The NSA’s principal tool to exploit the data links is a project called MUSCULAR, operated jointly with the agency’s British counterpart, GCHQ. From undisclosed interception points, the NSA and GCHQ are copying entire data flows across fiber-optic cables that carry information between the data centers of the Silicon Valley giants.

The infiltration is especially striking because the NSA, under a separate program known as PRISM, has front-door access to Google and Yahoo user accounts through a court-approved process.

So, front door for whatever the "court" allows, back door MUSCULAR for everything else.
Visually:

It gets better:

In an NSA presentation slide on “Google Cloud Exploitation,” however, a
sketch shows where the “Public Internet” meets the internal “Google
Cloud” where their data resides. In hand-printed letters, the drawing
notes that encryption is “added and removed here!” The artist adds a smiley face, a cheeky celebration of victory over Google security.

Two engineers with close ties to Google exploded in profanity when they saw the drawing. “I hope you publish this,” one of them said.

And a comprehensive schematic:


Keith Alexander's response was simple: it would be illegal for the NSA to break into Google or Yahoo databases. Because the threshold of illegality always stopped the NSA before and because spies never lie...

New NSA free internet from Brazil

Creating alternatives to the existing cyberspace, its decentralization, could be used for closing down borders around some kind of national Internet, Jérémie Zimmerman from the Internet Liberties and Digital Rights advocacy group warns.
A South American nation - Brazil - has been calling for a new, secure cyberspace to be created, in response to the NSA scandal. 
That idea has received the backing of the other BRICS nations - Russia, India, China, and South Africa, who are now considering laying a vast network of data cables, immune to NSA snooping technology. 
RT: So, it sounds like quite a costly idea?
Jérémie Zimmerman: It sounds costly, but it’s probably worth it. The more cables there would be, the more routes for information to go through the Internet, the better the communication will be overall. If more people invest in more cables, then it means more Internet. 
RT: What are they going to do, are they going to have their own fiber optic cables, etc? How can they be sure that the NSA won’t hack into them anyway? 
JZ: Well, you can never be sure. But one thing is for sure: when the cable ends up in the US, then NSA has full access. If the cable ends up somewhere else, then it’s yours to secure its access. Of course, there are questions: the hardware that will be used on both ends of those cables is one point for interception, and of course if those cables are used to make information transit to websites such as Google or Facebook, all the websites in which NSA has full access, it won’t solve per se the question of privacy invasion on the massive scale by the NSA. 
RT: It comes to something, looking to the future when we’ve got Internet dedicated to various people’s political outlooks. It’s kind of scary, well, I mean, the whole point of the Internet is that it’s freedom for everyone, it’s a scary thought if it goes down this path?
JZ: It’s not that scary because Internet relies on decentralization, so the more cables, the more routes, the more options there will be for data to transit through the Internet, the better it will be. Of course, this decentralization could be used for nationalization, could be used for closing down borders around some kind of national Internet, and we see that in many countries today, such as China, Iran, even in Russia. So the question is: how much [longer] will we tolerate decentralization and with which guarantees will [they ensure] respect for human rights. Per se, laying down the new fiber optics doesn’t look like a risk for fundamental freedoms.
RT: Could governments use them for their own games, though, in some shape or form?
JZ: Governments don’t need new transcontinental cables to play their own game. All they need is to have access to companies, who locally run access to the Internet or the Internet service. So we see countries such as China, Iran, or Russia, or others, pressure operators locally to operate censorship. So they don’t need transcontinental links to do so. 
RT: But laying these cables would be hugely costly – so isn’t there any simpler way to protect people’s data from the prying eyes of the NSA?
JZ: Taking back control of a communication infrastructure isn’t something silly. It really makes sense. We can think of a kind of digital sovereignty that countries should be free to apply, from cables to other key infrastructure. Of course it is not enough. I hope that those governments, along with laying down new cables, will, for instance, invest in new industrial policies, where they would foster the development of free liberal software and decentralized services, and then to an encryption to put back in the hands of their citizens ways of gaining back control over technology. With all new cables in the world, if people keep believing that they can trust Google, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft – then they’ll send all there is to the NSA. So of course it has to be a broader set of technological and political solutions, and also social solutions, to make citizens around the world understand that we must take back control of the infrastructure, we must take back control of communications, of our personal data. If we don’t control the machines, then the machines will control us.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Source: Russia Today

Org seeks Dick Cheney's arrest. Bush jnr convicted !

An international antiwar organization urged Canadian authorities to arrest former US vice president Dick Cheney over war crimes charges when he visits Toronto later this week.

Lawyers Against the War wrote in a letter that Cheney is "suspected on reasonable grounds of authorizing, counseling, aiding, abetting and failing to prevent torture.”

“Once Richard (Dick) Cheney enters Canada … Canada must ensure that Dick Cheney is either investigated and prosecuted for the indictable offence of torture in Canada or extradited to another country willing and able to do so," the group added.

Cheney, who served from 2001 to 2009 under former president George W. Bush, was a key architect of the post-9/11 torture tactics and of the US invasion of Iraq that according to some estimates killed over one million people.

Cheney has said he was "a big supporter" of waterboarding and other so-called enhanced interrogation techniques against terrorism suspects during his vice presidency. He along with Bush and other top administration officials were convicted in absentia of war crimes last year in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, for torture and cruelty. The verdict was largely symbolic.

Opinion polls for both Chaney and Bush turned unfavorable during their second terms and their job disapproval ratings have been one the highest in US history.

On Sunday, Cheney said that military action in Iran is likely unavoidable in order to stop Iran’s nuclear energy program.

He made the remarks after George Stephanopoulos, host of ABC's 'This Week' program, asked him, "is military action against Iran inevitable?"

"I have trouble seeing how we're going to achieve our objective short of that (military action)," Cheney said.

AHT/ARA
Source: PressTV

"NSA Tapped The Pope"

Spied On Vatican To Prevent "Threats To Financial System"

In the latest blow, and a new low, for the US spying agency, earlier today Italian magazine Panorama blasted a preview of an article due for publication tomorrow, with the simple premise: "NSA had tapped the pope." According to a Reuters report, the "spy agency had eavesdropped on Vatican phone calls, possibly including when former Pope Benedict's successor was under discussion, but the Holy See said it had no knowledge of any such activity. Panorama magazine said that among 46 million phone calls followed by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) in Italy from December 10, 2012, to January 8, 2013, were conversations in and out of the Vatican." But while it is unclear just what divine information the NSA had hoped to uncover by spying on the Vatican, what is an absolute headbanger, is that according to Panorama one of the reasons for the illegal wiretaps was to be abreast of "threats to the financial system." We can only assume this means keeping on top of Goldman's activities around the globe: after all, when one intercepts god's phone calls, one is mostly interested what the bank that does god's will is doing.
 
From Reuters:

Asked to comment on the report, Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi said: "We are not aware of anything on this issue and in any case we have no concerns about it."
Media reports based on revelations from Edward Snowden, the fugitive former U.S. intelligence operative granted asylum in Russia, have said the NSA had spied on French citizens over the same period in December in January.
Panorama said the recorded Vatican phone calls were catalogued by the NSA in four categories - leadership intentions, threats to the financial system, foreign policy objectives and human rights.
Benedict resigned on February 28 this year and his successor, Pope Francis, was elected on March 13.
"It is feared" that calls were listened to up until the start of the conclave that elected Francis, the former Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Argentina, Panorama said.
The magazine said there was also a suspicion that the Rome residence where some cardinals lived before the conclave, including the future pope, was monitored.

Cue another US ambassador being summoned by an "ally" country, more questions about just what US taxpayer funds are being spent on, more public indignation, and even more bad will (if that is even possible) toward the great, globalist US superstate that is no longer accountable to anyone but itself and a few select oligarchs.
Source: ZeroHedge.com