from
SubversiveElement Website
Last year, in October, the congressman
Denis J. Kucinich introduced in the American Congress a bill,
obliging the American president to get engaged in the negotiations
aimed at the ban of space based weapons.
In this bill the definition
of a weapon system includes: any other unacknowledged or as yet
undeveloped means inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or
destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental
health, or physical and economic well-being of a person) through the
use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using
radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic,
laser, or other
energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations or
the purpose of information war, mood management, or
mind control of
such persons or populations (12).
As in all legislative acts quoted in
this article the bill counts with sound, light or electromagnetic
stimulation of human brain.
Psychotronic weapons remain, at least
for a layman uninformed of secret military research, in the sphere
of science fiction, since so far none of the published scientific
experiments was presented in the way which would allow for its
replication.
That it is feasible to manipulate human behavior with the use of subliminal, either sound or visual, messages is now generally known. This is why in most of the countries the use of such technologies, without consent of the user, is banned. Devices using light for the stimulation of the brain show another way how the light flashing in certain frequencies could be used for the manipulation of human psychic life. As for the sound, a report on the device transmitting a beam of sound waves, which can hear only persons at whom the beam of sound waves is targeted, appeared last year in the world newspapers.
That it is feasible to manipulate human behavior with the use of subliminal, either sound or visual, messages is now generally known. This is why in most of the countries the use of such technologies, without consent of the user, is banned. Devices using light for the stimulation of the brain show another way how the light flashing in certain frequencies could be used for the manipulation of human psychic life. As for the sound, a report on the device transmitting a beam of sound waves, which can hear only persons at whom the beam of sound waves is targeted, appeared last year in the world newspapers.
The beam is formed by a combination of
sound and ultrasound waves which causes that a person targeted by
this beam hears the sound inside of his head. Such a perception
could easily convince the human being that it is mentally ill. The
acts presented in this article suggest that with the development of
technology and knowledge of the functioning of human brain new ways
of manipulation of human mind keep emerging. One of them seems to be
the electromagnetic energy.
Though in the open scientific literature only some 30 experiments were published, supporting this assumption (1),(2), already in 1974, in the USSR, after successful testing with military unit in Novosibirsk, the installation Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered with the Government Committee on the Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of the USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of radio waves (3), (4), (5).
Though in the open scientific literature only some 30 experiments were published, supporting this assumption (1),(2), already in 1974, in the USSR, after successful testing with military unit in Novosibirsk, the installation Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered with the Government Committee on the Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of the USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of radio waves (3), (4), (5).
In the scientific literature
technical feasibility of making a human being asleep by radio waves
is confirmed in the book by English scientist carrying out research
on the biological effects of electromagnetism (6).
In the report by World Health
Association on non-ionizing radiation from 1991 we read,
"Many of biological effects observed in animals exposed to ELF fields appear to be associated, either directly or indirectly, with the nervous system" (2).
Among the published experiments there are experiments
where pulsed microwaves caused the synchronization of isolated
neurons with the frequency of pulsing of microwaves - for example a
neuron firing at a frequency 0.8 Hz was forced in this way to fire
the impulses at a frequency of 1 Hz.
As well pulsed microwaves
changed the concentration of neurotransmitters in brain
(neurotransmitters are a part of the mechanism which causes the
firing of neurons in the brain) and reinforced or attenuated the
effects of drugs delivered into the brain (1).
The experiment where the main brain
frequencies registered by EEG were synchronized with the frequency
of microwave pulsing (1,2) might explain the function of the Russian
installation Radioson. Microwaves pulsed in the sleep frequency
would cause the synchronization of the brain activity with the sleep
frequency and in this way produce the sleep. Pulsing of microwaves
in frequency predominating in the brain at awaked state could by the
same procedure deny the sleep to a human being.
A report derived from the testing program of the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Read Army Institute of research states,
A report derived from the testing program of the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Read Army Institute of research states,
"Microwave pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system and produce stimulation similar to electric stimulation unrelated to heat".
In a many times replicated experiment
microwaves pulsed in an exact frequency caused the efflux of calcium
ions from the nerve cells (1,2).
Calcium plays a key role in the firing
of neurons and Ross Adey, member of the first scientific team which
published this experiment, publicly expressed his conviction that
this effect of electromagnetic radiation would interfere with
concentration on complex tasks (7).
Robert Becker, who had share in
the discovery of the effect of pulse-fields at the healing of broken
bones, published the excerpts from the report from Walter Reed Army
Institute testing program. In the first part "prompt debilitation
effects" should have been tested (8).
Were not those effects based on the
experiment by Ross Adey and others with calcium efflux?
British
scientist John Evans, working in the same field, wrote that both
Ross Adey and Robert Becker lost their positions and research grants
and called them "free-thinking exiles" (6). In 1975, in the USA, a
military experiment was published where pulsed microwaves produced,
in the brain of a human subject, an audio perception of numbers from
1 to 10 (9). Again the possibility to convince human being that it
is mentally ill is obvious.
The testing program of American Walter Read Army Institute of Research, where the experiment took place, counts with "prompt auditory stimulation by means of auditory effects" and finally aims at "behavior controlled by stimulation" (8). Let us imagine that the words delivered into the brain were transcribed into ultrasound frequencies. Would not then the subject perceive those words as his own thoughts? And could not then his behavior be controlled in this way?
The testing program of American Walter Read Army Institute of Research, where the experiment took place, counts with "prompt auditory stimulation by means of auditory effects" and finally aims at "behavior controlled by stimulation" (8). Let us imagine that the words delivered into the brain were transcribed into ultrasound frequencies. Would not then the subject perceive those words as his own thoughts? And could not then his behavior be controlled in this way?
The American Air Force 1982 "Final
Report On Biotechnology Research Requirements For Aeronautical
Systems Through the Year 2000" states:
"While initial attention should be toward degradation of human performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field effects, subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and interrogating mental functioning, using externally applied fields" (10).
Several scientists warned that latest
advances in neurophysiology could be used for the manipulation of
human brain.
In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who worked on the
American Navy's project of Non-lethal electromagnetic weapons (11),
published, in a scientific magazine, an article where he states: the
technical capability to influence directly the major portion of the
approximately six billion brains of the human species without
mediation through classical sensory modalities by generating neural
information within a physical medium within which all members of the
species are immersed is now marginally feasible (12).
In 1998, the French National Bioethics
Committee warned that neuroscience is being increasingly recognized
as posing potential threat to human rights (13).
In May 1999 the neuroscientists
conference, sponsored by
the UN, took place in Tokyo. In the
declaration we read:
"Today we have intellectual, physical and financial resources to master the power of the brain itself, and to develop devices to touch the mind and even control or erase consciousness. We wish to profess our hope that such pursuit of knowledge serves peace and welfare" (14).
The events at the international
political scene, in the last few years, confirm that the concept of
remote control of human brain is a matter of negotiations. In
January 1999 the European Parliament passed a resolution where it
calls for an international convention introducing a global ban on
all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any
form of manipulation of human beings. (15)
Already in 1997 nine states of the Union
of Independent States addressed OUN, OBSE and the states of the
Antiparliamentary Union with the proposal to place at the agenda of
the General Assembly of the Organization of United Nations the
preparation and conclusion of an international convention On
Prevention of Informational Wars and Limitation of Circulation of
Informational Weapons (17), (3).
The initiative was originally proposed,
in the Russian State Duma, by Vladimir Lopatin (1). V. Lopatin
worked, from 1990 to 1995, in sequence, in the Committees on Security
of the Russian Federation, Russian State Duma and Antiparliamentary
Assembly of the Commonwealth of Independent States, specializing in
informational security (3).
The concept of informational weapon or informational war is rather unknown to the world general public. In 1999, V. Lopatin, together with Russian scientist Vladimir Tsygankov, published a book Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia (3).
The concept of informational weapon or informational war is rather unknown to the world general public. In 1999, V. Lopatin, together with Russian scientist Vladimir Tsygankov, published a book Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia (3).
There we find the explanation of this
terminology:
"In the report on the research of the American Physical Society for the year 1993 the conclusion is presented that psychophysical weapon system scan be used for the construction of a strategic arm of a new type (informational weapon in informational war)"
Among many references to this subject we
find:
In 2000 V. Lopatin introduced, after two
other authors, the third in order bill on the subject of
"Informational and Psychological Security of the Russian
Federation".
The Russian newspaper Segodnya wrote
about this draft: means of informational-psychological influence are
capable not only to harm the health of a person, but, as well, cause
and quotation of Lopatin's draft follows the blocking of freedom of
will of human being on subliminal level, the loss of ability of
political, cultural and other self-identification of human being,
the manipulation of societal consciousness "and even destruction of
united informational and spiritual space of Russia" (17).
In the book "Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia" the authors propose among the basic principles of the Russian concept of the defense against the remote control of human psyche the acknowledgement of its factual existence as well as the acknowledgement of realistic feasibility of informational, psychotronic war (which as a matter of fact is actually taking place without declaration of war)" (19).
In the book "Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia" the authors propose among the basic principles of the Russian concept of the defense against the remote control of human psyche the acknowledgement of its factual existence as well as the acknowledgement of realistic feasibility of informational, psychotronic war (which as a matter of fact is actually taking place without declaration of war)" (19).
They quote as well the record from the
session of the Russian Federation Federal Council where V. Lopatin
stated that psychotronic weapon can,
"cause the blocking of the freedom of will of a human being on a subliminal level" or "instillation into the consciousness or sub-consciousness of a human being of information which will cause faulty perception of the reality" (20).
For that matter they propose the preparation of
national legislative as well as the norms of international law
"aimed at the defense of human psyche against subliminal,
destructive, informational effects" (21).
As well they propose the
declassification of all works on this technology and warn that, as a
consequence of the classification, the arms race is speeding up
making the psychotronic war probable. Among the possible sources of
remote influence on human psyche they list the generators of
physical fields" of "known as well as unknown nature" (22).
In 1999 the STOA (Scientific and Technological Options Assessment), part of the Directorate General for Research of the European Parliament published the report on Crowd Control Technologies, ordered by them with the OMEGA foundation in British Manchester (23).
In 1999 the STOA (Scientific and Technological Options Assessment), part of the Directorate General for Research of the European Parliament published the report on Crowd Control Technologies, ordered by them with the OMEGA foundation in British Manchester (23).
One of four major subjects of the study are the 2nd
generation" or "non lethal" technologies:
"This report evaluates the second generation of 'non-lethal' weapons which are emerging from national military and nuclear weapons laboratories in the United States as part of the Clinton Administration's 'non-lethal' warfare doctrine now adopted in turn by NATO. These devices include weapons using directed energy beam, radiofrequency, laser and acoustic mechanisms to incapacitate human targets" (24)The report states that the most controversial non-lethal' crowd control technology proposed by the U.S., are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior the greatest concern is with systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system" (25).The report also states that perhaps the most powerful developments remain shrouded in secrecy" (26).
The unavailability of
official documents confirming the existence of this technology may
be the reason why the OMEGA report is referencing, with respect to
mind control technology, the internet publication of the author of
this article (27).
In an identical approach the internet
publication of the directrice of the American human rights and anti
mind control organization (CAHRA), Cheryl Welsh, is referenced by
joint initiative of Quaker United Nations Office, United Nations
Institute for Disarmament Research, and Programme for Strategic and
International Security Studies, with respect to non-lethal weapons
(28).
On September 25th, 2000 the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma discussed the addendum to the article 6 of the Federal law On Weapons. In the resolution we read:
On September 25th, 2000 the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma discussed the addendum to the article 6 of the Federal law On Weapons. In the resolution we read:
The achievements of contemporary science allow for creation of measured methods of secret, remote influencing on the psyches and physiology of a person or a group of people" (29).
The committee recommended that the
addendum be approved.
The addendum to the article 6 of the
Russian Federation law On Weapons,
"was approved on July 26, 2001. It states: within the territory of the Russian Federation is prohibited the circulation of weapons and other objects the effects of the operation of which are based on the use of electromagnetic, light, thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic radiations" (30).
In this way
the Russian government made a first step to stand up to its
dedication to the ban of mind control technology.
In the Doctrine of Informational
Security of the Russian Federation, signed by president Putin in
September 2000, among the dangers threatening the informational
security of Russian Federation, is listed the threat to the
constitutional rights and freedoms of people and citizens in the
sphere of spiritual life individual, group and societal
consciousness" and "illegal use of special means affecting
individual, group and societal consciousness" (31).
Among the major directions of the
international cooperation toward the guaranteeing of the
informational security is listed the ban of production,
dissemination and use of 'informational weapon' " (32). This should
be interpreted as the continuing Russian dedication to the
international ban of the means of remote influencing of the activity
of human brain.
In the above mentioned report, published by the STOA, the originally proposed version of the resolution of the European Parliament is quoted, calling for an international convention for a global ban on all research and development which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable the manipulation of human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible deployment of such systems."(33) Here the term "actual" might easily mean that such weapons are already deployed.
In the above mentioned report, published by the STOA, the originally proposed version of the resolution of the European Parliament is quoted, calling for an international convention for a global ban on all research and development which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable the manipulation of human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible deployment of such systems."(33) Here the term "actual" might easily mean that such weapons are already deployed.
Among the countries with the most
advanced military technologies those are the USA which did not
present any international initiative demanding the ban of
technologies enabling the remote control of human mind. (The
original version of the bill by Denis J. Kucinich was changed.)
All the same, according to the study
published by STOA, the USA are the major promoter of the use of
those arms.
Non lethal technology was included into NATO military
doctrine due to their effort:
"At the initiative of the USA, within the framework of NATO, a special group was formed, for the perspective use of devices of non-lethal effects" states the record from the session of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma (29).
The report published by STOA states:
"In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in allied arsenals" (34). "In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S. Army included directed energy systems" and "radio frequency weapons" (35) - those weapons, as was suggested in the STOA report as well, are being associated with the effects on human nervous system.
According to the Russian government
informational agency FAPSI, in the last 15 years, the U.S. expenses
on the development and acquisition of the means of informational war
grew four times and at present time they occupy the first place
among all military programs (17),(3).
Though there are other concepts
of informational war than mind control, the unwillingness of the USA
to engage in the negotiations aimed at the ban of the manipulation
of human brains might indicate their intent to use those means in
internal as well as international affairs.
One clear consequence of the continuation of the apparent politics of secrecy surrounding technologies enabling remote control of human brains might be that the governments, who would own such technologies, could use them without having to take into consideration the opinion of the general public.
One clear consequence of the continuation of the apparent politics of secrecy surrounding technologies enabling remote control of human brains might be that the governments, who would own such technologies, could use them without having to take into consideration the opinion of the general public.
The concept of the
democratic world would be, though secretly, disrupted in this way,
and in the future the world populations could live in only fake
democracy where their own or foreign governments might, by means of
secret technologies, shape their opinions.
