In March 2012 the Russian defense minister Anatoli Serdjukov said:
“The development of weaponry based on new physics principles; direct-energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, genetic weapons, psychotronic weapons, etc., is part of the state arms procurement program for 2011-2020,”Voice of Russia
The world media reacted to this hint on
the open use of psychotronic weapons by the publication of scientific
experiments from the 1960‘s where electromagnetic waves were used to
transmit simple sounds into the human brain. However, most of them
avoided saying that since then extensive scientific research has been
carried out in this area throughout the world. Only a Colombian
newspaper, El Spectador, published an article covering the whole scale of the achievements of this (computerized English translation).
Britain’s Daily Mail, as another
exception, wrote that research in electromagnetic weapons has been
secretly carried out in the USA and Russia since the 1950’s and that
„previous research has shown that low-frequency waves or beams can
affect brain cells, alter psychological states and make it possible to
transmit suggestions and commands directly into someone’s thought
processes. High doses of microwaves can damage the functioning of internal organs, control behaviour or even drive victims to suicide.”
In 1975, a neuropsychologist Don R.
Justesen, the director of Laboratories of Experimental Neuropsychology
at Veterans Administration Hospital in Kansas City, unwittingly leaked
National Security Information. He published an article in “American
Psychologist” on the influence of microwaves on living creatures’
behavior.
In the article he quoted the results of
an experiment described to him by his colleague, Joseph C. Sharp, who
was working on Pandora, a secret project of the American Navy.
Don R. Justesen wrote in his article:
“By radiating themselves with these ‘voice modulated’ microwaves, Sharp and Grove were readily able to hear, identify, and distinguish among the 9 words. The sounds heard were not unlike those emitted by persons with artificial larynxes” (pg. 396).
That this system was later brought to
perfection is proved by the document which appeared on the website of
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1997, where its Office of
Research and Development presented the Department of Defense’s
project:“Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect”.In the
description it said:
“An innovative and revolutionary technology is described that offers a low-probability-of-intercept radiofrequency (RF) communications. The feasibility of the concept has been established using both a low intensity laboratory system and a high power RF transmitter. Numerous military applications exist in areas of search and rescue, security and special operations” (See web.iol.cz)
In January 2007 the Washington Post wrote on the same subject:
“In 2002, the Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a technology: using microwaves to send words into someone’s head… Rich Garcia, a spokesman for the research laboratory’s directed energy directorate, declined to discuss that patent or current or related research in the field, citing the lab’s policy not to comment on its microwave work. In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed for this article, the Air Force released unclassified documents surrounding that 2002 patent — records that note that the patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects, albeit with marginal intelligibility. Research appeared to continue at least through 2002. Where this work has gone since is unclear — the research laboratory, citing classification, refused to discuss it or release other materials“
We can only stress again that the world
media avoid publishing the full scale of the progress in the research of
the remote control of human nervous system. Dr. Robert Becker, who was
twice nominated for Nobel Prize for his share in the discovery of the
effects of pulsed fields at the healing of broken bones, wrote in his
book “Body Electric” about the experiment from 1974 by J. F. Schapitz,
released due to the Freedom of Information Act request.
J.F. Schapitz stated:
“In this investigation it will be shown that the spoken word of hypnotist may also be conveyed by modulated electromagnetic energy directly into the subconscious parts of the human brain – i. e. without employing any technical devices for receiving or transcoding the messages and without the person exposed to such influence having a chance to control the information input consciously.”
In one of the four experiments subjects
were given a test of hundred questions, ranging from easy to technical
ones. Later, not knowing they were being irradiated, they would be
subjected to information beams suggesting the answers to the questions
they had left blank, amnesia for some of their correct answers, and
memory falsification for other correct answers. After 2 weeks they had
to pass the test again (Dr. Robert Becker: Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life,
William Morrow and comp., New York, 1985,. The results of the second
test were never published. It is rather evident that in those
experiments the messages were sent into human brain in ultrasound
frequencies which the human brain perceives, but of which the subject is
unaware. Dr. Robert Becker, due to those publications and his refusal
to support the building of the antennae for the communication with
submarines in brain frequencies, lost financial support for his research
which meant an end to his scientific career.
Transmitting human speech into the human
brain by means of electromagnetic waves is apparently, for the
researchers, one of the most difficult tasks. It must be much easier to
control human emotions which motivate human thinking, decision making
and actions. People who claim to be victims of experiments with those
devices complain, aside of hearing voices, of false feelings (including
orgasms) as well of aches of internal organs which the physicians are
unable to diagnose.
In November 2000 the Committee on
Security of the Russian State Duma stated that capabilities enabling
remote control of the human nervous system or the remote infliction of
health impairment are available to many modern governments .See web.iol.cz
It is rather evident that those
technologies are used, in conflict with the Nuremberg code, for
experiments on unwitting human subjects. In 2001 the newspaper of the
U.S. army, Defense News, wrote that Israel was experimenting with those
weapons on Palestinians. Ibid
As well ousted Honduran president Manuel
Zelaya, while under siege in Brazilian embassy in Honduras, complained
that he had been subjected to an “electron bombardment with microwaves”
which produces “headache and organic destabilization” The Guardian, October 2008
When asked by Amy Goodman from Democracy Now: „
As president, do you know about this in the Honduran arsenal?” He replied: „Yes, of course“
The use of those weapons is time and
again reemerging in times of political crisis. According to Russian
daily newspapers, during the failed putsch against Mikhail Gorbachov in
1991, general Kobets warned the defenders of the Russian White House
that mind control technology could be used against them (Komsomolskaya
Pravda, September 7,1991, O. Volkov, „Sluchi o tom chto nam davili na
psychiku nepotverzdalis. Poka“).
After the putsch, the vice president of
the League of Independent Scientists of the USSR, Victor Sedlecki,
published a declaration in the Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda where
he stated:
As an expert and a legal entity I declare that mass production … of psychotronic biogenerators was launched in Kiev (this is indeed a very serious issue). I cannot assert for sure that that were exactly Kiev generators that were used during the putsch… However, the fact that they were used is obvious to me. What are psychotronic generators? It is an electronic equipment producing the effect of guided control in human organism. It especially affects the left and right hemisphere of the cortex. This is also the technology of the U.S. Project Zombie 5“. He further stated that due to the inexperience of the personnel who operated them the attempt to use the generators failed(Komsomolskaya Pravda, August 27,1991, “Avtory programy Zombi obnaruzheny v Kieve”,
In the USA, at present several hundred
people complaining of the remote manipulation of their nervous system
are preparing a class action lawsuit against the FBI, Department of
Defense and other agencies, requesting them to release files pertaining
to their persons, detect the harmful radiations aimed at their bodies
and sources of those radiations. As well perhaps over 2000 people are
complaining in Russia, over 200 in Europe, over 300 in Japan and tens of
people in China and India. Russian politician, Vladimir Lopatin, who
was working on Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma and
introduced there a bill banning the use of those technologies, admitted
in his book „Psychotronic Weapon and Security of Russia“ (publishing
house Sinteg, Moscow, 1999) that in Russia experiments on unwitting
citizens are carried out, when he wrote: „
Compensation of damages and losses connected with social rehabilitation of persons suffering from destructive informational influence must be realized in legal trial“ (excerpts from the book in English
(http://mojmir.webuda.com/Psychotronic_Weapon_and_the_Security_of_Russia, pg. 113).
It should be understood that most of
those people pass through mental hospitals. Vladimir Lopatin visited the
USA in 1999 as a chairman of the Military Reform Subcommittee of the
USSR Supreme Soviet Committee for Issues of Defense and State Security
and met with Richard Cheney. At that time he was described as the
“leader of a new breed of Soviet dissidents”. Then he disappeared from
top ranks of Russian politicians.
Why has this research remained
classified until present time? There are two explanations for this:
First there is a secret arms race in progress in the world where the
superpowers compete to gain decisive supremacy in this area and in this
way master the control of the whole world. Second the governments keep
those technologies in store for the case that they would not be able to
control, by democratic means, the crisis that may arise as a result of
their poor decisions. In both cases the era of democracy and human
freedom in history will come to an end. According to the declaration of
the former Russian Defense minister Serdjukov, there are maximally eight
years left within which those weapons will officially become a part of
the Russian military arsenal. For democracy this would mean a beginning
of the end.
Anyway, in the past Russians were not
resolved to put those means to work. When the construction of the
American system HAARP was launched, with the system supposedly being
able to target large regions of the planet by vibrating the ionosphere in brain frequencies (in
this experiment the brain frequencies were not used, but the HAARP
system can transmit in brain frequencies as well), Russia declared its
willingness to ban mind control technologies. The Russian State Duma and
consequently , the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of
Independent States addressed the United Nations, OBSE and the European
Council with a proposal for an international convention banning the
development and use of informational weapons. According to the Russian
newspaper Segodnya in March 1998, the matter was discussed with U.N.
secretary general Kofi Anan, and included on the agenda of the General
Assembly of the U.N. web.iol,cz, op cit
It is most likely the USA refused to
negotiate this convention and in consequence the ban of informational
weapons was not discussed by the United Nations General Assembly. Even
in the U.S. congress appeared a bill proposing the ban of mind control
technologies http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?c107:chemtrails.
But this was only for a very short
period of time. The bill was then changed and in the new bill the ban of
those technologies was left out of the Space Preservation Bill. Neither
the U.S. congress nor the U.S. president made ever an effort to ban
mind control weapons. The European Parliament reacted as well to the launch of the HAARP system construction, when it called in 1999 for the ban of manipulation of human beings.
The resolution was passed after the
testimony of the American author of the book “Angels Don’t Play this
HAARP”, Nick Begich, which apparently convinced the European Parliament
of the possible use of this system to manipulate minds of whole
populations. In the report by the European Parliament’s STOA (Science
and Technological Options Assessment) panel “Crowd Control Technologies”
the originally proposed text of the European Parliament’s resolution is
quoted. There the European Parliament calls “for an international
convention and global ban on all research and development , whether
civilian or military , which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical,
electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to
the development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation
of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment (stressed
by the author of the article) of such systems“. (40, pg CII, ref. 369).
But apparently at the same time the European countries resigned on this
intention when accepting the NATO politics of non-lethal weapons.
The same STOA report claims that the USA is a major promoter of the use of those arms and that:
“In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in allied arsenals” (pg. xlv) and it goes on:
“In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S. Army included… directed energy systems” and “radio frequency weapons”European Parliament
(at the bottom of the page, second reference pg. Xlvi).
Directed energy system is further defined by the STOA document: „
Directed energy weapon system designed
to match radio frequency source to interfere with human brain activity
at synapse level“ (at the bottom of the page, first reference, Appendix
6-67). Since 1999 those weapons have been upgraded for another 13
years. European Parliament
In 1976 the future National Security
advisor to president Carter, Zbygniew Brzezinski, wrote a book “Between
Two Ages, America’s Role in the Technetronic Era” (Penguin Books, 1976,
Massachusets). In the book he predicted “more controlled and directed
society” based on the development of technology, where an elite group
will play a leading role, which will take advantage of persisting social
crises to use “the latest modern techniques for influencing public
behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control”.
The use of mind control technologies was
predicted as well in the publication of Strategic Studies Institute of
the U.S. Army War College, published in 1994
The scenario for the year 2000 expected the growth of terrorism, drug trafficking and criminality and drew a conclusion:
“The president was thus amenable to the use of the sort of psychotechnology which formed the core of the RMA (revolution in military affairs)… it was necessary to rethink our ethical prohibitions on manipulating the minds of enemies (and potential enemies) both international and domestic… Through persistent efforts and very sophisticated domestic ”consciousness raising”, old-fashioned notions of personal privacy and national sovereignty changed. As technology changed the way force was applied, things such as personal courage, face-to-face leadership, and the ‘warfighter’ mentality became irrelevant.”…
“Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified using the comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as ‘potential’ or ‘active’, with sophisticated personality simulations used to develop, tailor and focus psychological campaigns for each“. So the Institute of Strategic Studies supposed that in the year 2000 those technologies would be that advanced that it will be possible to deprive human being of his freedom and adjust his personality to the needs of ruling elite. Most probably those technologies were at this level already in 1994.
The attempts to make the general public
acquainted with the existence of those weapons are, with respect to the
fact that it is evident that democratic public would require immediate
ban of those technologies, systematically suppressed. Vladimir Lopatin
wrote:
„The arms race is speeding up as a consequence of classification. Secrecy – this is in the first place the way to secure cruel control over the people… the way how to curtail their creativity, turn them into biorobots…”, and that psychotronic war “is already taking place without declaration of war, secretly… Only if the work on mind control problem is no more covered by the screen of secrecy, extraordinariness, mysteriousness, if complex, open scientific research with international participation, is carried out, the psychotronic war including the use of psychotronic weapon can be prevented”.
The article “Informacni zbrane ohrozuji
demokracii a lidstvo” was deleted from the website of the Czech internet
newspaper Britske Listy (www.blisty.cz). The sharing of the original web address of the English version of the same article – Means of Information War Threaten Democracy and Mankind – is blocked on Facebook and a similar article was deleted from the webpage of the Australian magazine “New Dawn”.
There exist no legislations punishing
the use of those technologies by governments. Only in Russia and some of
the states in the USA there are legislations punishing the ownership or
trading with those technologies by non governmental entities. For
example in the state of Michigan the sentence for this crime is equal to the sentence for ownership or trading with weapons of mass destruction.
The readers who will be reached by this
article and prefer democratic political system would help its
preservation if they forwarded the article to their friends.
