What you didn't know about taxes and the Crown
There are two Crowns operant in England,
one being Queen Elizabeth II. Although extremely wealthy, the Queen
functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect
attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders
through their control of the English Parliament. This other Crown is
comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England
(House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre,
independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or simply ‘The
City.’
The City is not a part of England, just as Washington is not a part
of the USA. The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on
earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually.
When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by
the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to
enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City
walking several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed
in anything other than service uniforms.
In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world’s trade was carried by
British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to pay
commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world’s
oceans.
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the
protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or
British wealth, but the Crown’s commerce and the Crown’s wealth. As of
1850, author Frederick Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in
excess of $10 billion. Today, the bonded indebtedness of the world is
held by the Crown.
The aforementioned Temple Bar is the juristic arm of the Crown and
holds an exclusive monopoly on global legal fraud through their Bar
Association franchises. The Temple Bar is comprised of four Inns of
Court. They are; the Middle Temple, Inner Temple, Lincoln’s Inn and
Gray’s Inn. The entry point to these closed secret societies is only to
be found when one is called to their Bar.
The Bar attorneys in the United States owe their allegiance and
pledge their oaths to the Crown. All Bar Associations throughout the
world are signatories and franchises to the International Bar
Association located at the Inns of Court of the Crown Temple.
The Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license that
bleeds Canada and Great Britain white, while the Middle Temple has
license to steal from America. To have the Declaration of Independence
recognized internationally, Middle Templar King George III agreed in the
Treaty of Paris of 1783 to establish the legal Crown entity of the
incorporated United States, referred to internally as the Crown Temple
States (Colonies). States spelled with a capital letter ‘S,’ denotes a
legal entity of the Crown.
At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown,
signed the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both
parties were agents of the Crown. There is no lawful effect when a party
signs as both the first and second parties. The Declaration was simply
an internal memo circulating among private members of the Crown. Most
Americans believe that they own their own land, but they have merely
purchased real estate by contract. Upon fulfillment of the contract,
control of the land is transferred by Warranty Deed. The Warranty Deed
is only a ‘color of title.’ Color of Title is a semblance or appearance
of title, but not title in fact or in law. The Warranty Deed cannot
stand against the Land Patent.
The Crown was granted Land Patents in North America by the King of
England. Colonials rebelled at the usurious Crown taxes, and thus the
Declaration of Independence was created to pacify the populace.
Another method used to hoodwink natural persons is enfranchisement.
Those cards in your wallet bearing your name spelled in all capital
letters means that you have been enfranchised and have the status of a
corporation. A ‘juristic personality’ has been created, and you have
entered into multi-variant agreements that place you in an equity
relationship with the Crown.
These invisible contracts include: birth certificates, citizenship
records, employment agreements, driver’s licenses and bank accounts. It
is perhaps helpful to note here that contracts do not now, nor have they
ever had to be stated in writing in order to be enforceable by American
judges. If it is written down, it is merely a written statement of the
contract.
read more...
TPP -
by Kristinn Hrafnsson, WikiLeaks SpokespersonThe leaked secret draft of the TPP´s (Trans-Pacific Partnership) Environment Chapter, published today by WikiLeaks, underscores how multinational corporate interests rule the negotiating process of this important 12-nation treaty, representing more than 40 per cent of the world's GDP and one-third of world trade.
On 13 November last year, WikiLeaks released the secret draft text of the Intellectual Property Rights Chapter, which showed how nations were forced to change laws and to prosecute in defence of the biggest corporate interests in the field of IP rights.
In sharp contrast, the Environment Chapter does not include enforcement mechanisms serving the defence of the environment; it is vague and weak, and adheres to the lowest common denominator of environmental interests.
The word “appropriate” is found in various forms in 43 places in the draft text, in such contexts as: “Where possible and appropriate, the Parties shall seek to complement and utilise their existing cooperation mechanisms and take into account relevant work of regional and international organizations.” The word “may” is also found 43 times in the 23-page draft.
In the draft Consolidated Text, governments are urged to “...make every effort to arrive at a mutually satisfactory resolution...”, “...by any technological means available agreed by the consulting Parties...”, “...on the basis of objectivity, reliability and sound judgment...”, “...provided that the disputed Parties so agree...”, “...take measures to prevent...”, “...shall make best efforts...”, “...exercise restraint in taking recourse...”, “...in recognition of the importance...”, “...each Party retains the right to make decisions...”, “...adopt or maintain appropriate measures...”.
A selection of other favourite words in the draft include: “enhance” (12), “consider” (12), “encourage” (11), “address” (10), “endeavour” (9) and “seek” (9).
The Environment Chapter clearly shows the intention to first and foremost protect trade, not the environment. The principle is spelled out in this draft that local environmental laws are not to obstruct trade or investment between the countries. Furthermore, there is great emphasis on the self-regulatory principle when it comes to environmental protection, and emphasis on “...flexible, voluntary mechanisms, such as voluntary auditing and reporting, market-based incentives, voluntary sharing of information and expertise and public-private partnership”. But even such measures should be designed in a manner that “...avoids the creation of unnecessary barriers to trade”.
The Consolidated Text of the Environment Chapter of the TPP Agreement was drafted by Canadian officials after bilateral consultations with other TPP Parties. It is dated November 24, 2013, the last day of the TPP Chief Negotiators' summit in Salt Lake City, Utah. It outlines what the Chairs of the TPP Environment Working Group evaluate as a compromise of the Parties' different positions across issues. In a separate four-page document the Chairs of the Environment Working Group outline the main obstacles to agreement between the negotiating countries.
It is noteworthy in the assessment by the Chairs that the US government is isolated in its interest in placing enforcing mechanisms into the treaty to protect the environment. Without access to the negotiating table, it is hard to assess if the US representatives fought for this principle with the same vigour as they did for policing and enforcement on behalf of intellectual property interests, as can be seen in the leaked IP Chapter.
The TPP negotiations have been shrouded in secrecy during the three years the treaty has been in the making. The United States, as the largest of the 12 economies party to the negotiations, had originally pushed for the closure of the agreement before the end of 2013. According to recent reports quoting Andrew Robb, the Australian trade minister, the negotiations are in the final stages and the treaty is “ready to be sealed”.
The Obama administration wants to fast-track the TPP treaty through the US Congress, preventing Congress from amending or discussing any part of it. A bill to this effect was released last Thursday, 9 January, by the leaders of the Congressional committees with jurisdiction over US free trade agreements.
With the WikiLeaks release of the drafts of two of the most controversial chapters of the TPP, the media has now an opportunity to critically dissect the issues with the public interest in mind.
The TPP negotiations have wider implications than for the 800 million people in the 12 negotiating countries because the US administration, the dominant Party at the table, has declared that the principles outlined in the TPP will be a benchmark in the equally secretive US-EU trade talks for the TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership) initiated in January 2013.
Current TPP negotiation member states are the United States, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei.